Feeding dog waste into the public digester turns these actions into something much more critical, visual, and participatory. This public urban intervention questions both global and local issues, and at the same time creates local responses to issues of sustainability and lifestyle choices. This is a chance to be good to the planet, and to also start to think about how we could relate to each other in new unexplored ways, such as using the flame made from dog waste to boil water for coffee, focusing the light to create a projector, baking bread, power a street light on a dark corner, or whatever else comes to mind. ![]() Along with the ecological benefits of burning methane (see below) also comes heat and light from the flame which becomes an opportunity for others (facilitated by the Park Spark Project) to appropriate the gas in exceptional ways by building use for this constant source of energy and participate in the events that are spurred by the projects. This unique multi-user transdisciplinary project is a direct challenge to anyone who thinks they have a good idea of what to use the flame for. The flame of the Park Spark project will burn in a lamppost as a monument until the energy is redirected into another project. This intervention uses conventional forms of urban infrastructure to create new possibilities for social interactions while questioning existing ones. The Park Spark project proposes these new “green technologies” have as a design criteria, a community-building aspect that addresses social, environmental, economic, and aesthetic issues, as well as exposes the individual’s relationship with their immediate surroundings to make visible the presence of nature within the fabric of urban life. These new technologies can open up new social layers for us to interact within. ![]() Since we live in a world that is so infused with technology, considering these new “green” ideas becomes a moment to change the way we interact with our surroundings and inevitably with each other. The idea of living “green” goes beyond keeping us comfortable and opens our eyes to the relationship we have with the surroundings, by questioning the role of technology in our lives. When developing these new technologies - art, culture, and community involvement has to be employed as part of a more holistic solution to broaden our relationship with the earth, or we will just follow in our same consummeristic models that have kept us from a deepening in our understanding of what is happening. To rely directly on scientists and engineers to produce solutions for us to buy is missing the much larger point of what has brought us to this situation. Another branch asks us to change the way we live -riding bicycles, cloth grocery bags, composting, growing our own food, carpooling, etc. One branch of designing for a “green” world focuses on creating technologies that enable us to live the same way we have been living, but reduce the impact we have on our environment -solar energy, wind power, alternative fuels, etc. Only when we develop systems that restore a sense of connection to our surroundings and the impact our lives have on the environment will we illuminate a more holistic view of how our existence is connected to the world we live in. This type of strategy keeps us the same distance from how we conceive of our environment. Although, in our current push to develop green technologies that promise to “save us”, we learn to only interface with these green technologies, and not fully understand how they are directly related to the issues they alleviate. When we start to unveil how we are connected to our surroundings we are immediately shown a much more dynamic and interconnected picture of what we are part of. What lies beneath the circumstances that have driven us to develop “green technologies” is the fact that we are disconnected from our environment. Once in place, as long as people own pets in the city and throw away dog waste, the production of energy will be continuous and unlimited. The energy of the digester manifested as an ‘eternal flame’ is evidence of the redundant and unquestioned nature of our behaviors. This methane will burn constantly in the form of an 'eternal flame' monument until someone proposes an idea for the use of the flame. ![]() The Park Spark Project is based on substituting the common trashcan and plastic bag with a public methane digester and biodegradable bag, so that the dog waste collected is converted into a usable form of energy (methane). The waste contained in these plastic bags releases small amounts of methane that over time is a substantial quantity. Dog owners everywhere are collecting pet waste in plastic bags and then sending it to landfills.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |